• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

However, there is one highly specialized, deeply controversial archetype that completely ignores this fundamental rule: the Siege deck.

This playstyle is often viewed as incredibly toxic by the community because it forces the opponent to constantly play offense against a heavily fortified position.

Protecting the Asset

The entire strategy of a Siege deck revolves around a single, fragile building that costs a massive amount of elixir to deploy.

You are essentially building a localized, impenetrable wall of cheap units directly in front of the X-Bow, creating a defensive meat-grinder.

• An unsupported X-Bow is a massive 6-elixir donation to the enemy.
• Build the fortress first.
• Always know the opponent's 'tank' cycle.

The Mortar vs. The X-Bow

The X-Bow is a high-risk, high-reward machine gun; it costs 6 elixir and requires intense, immediate protection, but it can shred a tower from 100% to 0% in seconds.

Because it is cheaper, it is less punishing if it gets destroyed, making Mortar decks slightly more forgiving and versatile.

The Threat	Your Defense
Heavy Tanks (Golem, Giant) blocking the shots	Play hyper-defensively; use the Siege weapon purely as a defensive building in the center to stall for a draw
Heavy Spells (Rocket, Lightning) destroying the weapon	You must out-cycle their spell; play your X-Bow faster than they can draw their Rocket

The Most Hated Archetype

Playing a Siege deck is incredibly stressful; every match feels like a frantic puzzle of perfect placements and micro-interactions.

It is the ultimate control archetype, demanding flawless execution and cold, mathematical precision.

If you loved this article and you would like to acquire additional data concerning tower rush kindly go to the internet site.